VirtualBox – The Best Virtual Machine for Windows

Posted on November 15th, 2008, by Joel 18 Comments

Testing has been a daily habit of my life, since I test a lot of software I do not test them on my live OS (which is Vista SP2 beta), I rely on Virtual Machines to do all the testing and to check out new OS without any harm to my OS or partition.

There are three leading Virtual Machine Software, form three software giants in the IT industry. Below are the three products.

  1. Virtual PC 2007 (from Microsoft)
  2. VMware Workstation (from VMware)
  3. VirtualBox (from SUN Microsystems)

Here is a short comparison of the three in terms of few aspects I could come up with:

Comparison Factor

Virtual PC 2007

Virtual Box

VMware

Price FREE FREE USD 189.00
Host Support (Operating System where VM will be installed) Windows Vista Only (XP and older versions require Virtual PC 2004) Windows Vista, XP, 2000
Sun Solaris
Linux
Mac OSX
Windows Vista, XP, 2000
Linux
Guest Support (Operating System which will be installed on the VM) Only Different Versions of Microsoft Windows. Different Versions of Microsoft Windows
Linux
Solaris
Unix
Mac OSX
Different Versions of Microsoft Windows
Linux
Mac OSX
Virtual Machine Addons (Drivers for better performance of Guest OS) Interacts between Guest and Host Available Available Available
Performance (out of 5) 3 5 4
ISO Capture Available Available Available
Direct USB Support Not Available Available Not Available
Drag and Drop Files Not Available Available Available
Networking Available but does not work with the host. Available and works perfectly. Available but sometimes throws’ errors.
Management Console User Friendliness (out of 5) 4 5 2
Virtual Disk Management Easy Very Easy Hard
Overall Rating (out of 10 where 1 being worst and 10 being best)

5

9

7

The Verdict

After 2 weeks of testing, I have come to the below conclusions.

VMware is quite good but not worth all the money, not worth at all.

Virtual PC 2007 is ok but I have got tired of it due to the lack of features, especially the networking problem and the lack of USB support and the support to install a variety of guest OS. I have switched to VirtualBox.

This I believe is the new king of Virtual Machines, and it has features and performance better than the paid Virtual Machines.

View some VirtualBox screen shots

Get VirtualBox Here

Related posts:

  1. Enable Boot With USB Feature In VirtualBox
  2. Windows Live Messenger USB Stick Edition 8.5 Final
  3. Vista already getting cut down by Windows 7
  4. Methods to open .docx files
  5. Dexpot The Utility For Virtual Desktops

18 Responses to “VirtualBox – The Best Virtual Machine for Windows”

  1. theschneidi says:

    Hi, I wonder why you wrote that VPC 2007 will work only on Vista Systems. I have VPC 2007 installed on Windows XP SP2.

    What do you think about the free emulator qemu which is very fast but has no gui?

  2. blacknoise says:

    yes Virtual pc 2007 does work on XP now…earlier it did not and networking is very easy in virtual pc once you get the hang of it

  3. Marik says:

    Virtualbox is the best vm imho.

    It blows vmware away.

  4. Ekun says:

    Though I’m new to virtualization, and I do agree that at present, Virtualbox is better than the other two, I do find some of your conclusions questionable. One might even say inaccurate. For example, Virtual PC 2007 DOES support file drag and drop; I have no problem networking with the HOST operating system, and I am presently running Virtual PC 2007 on Windows XP PRO SP3.
    Like I said, I prefer Virtualbox, however a comparison should report facts only.

  5. Mark says:

    Yes, Virtual PC 2007 does support drag and drop between host and guest and vise versa. On the other hand, VirtualBox does NOT support that function even in the latest version which at the moment of writing this post is 2.1.4.

    Please post facts and not try to make a software look better by posting inaccurate information.

  6. blacknoise says:

    Yes Mark and Ekun are correct about that. VPC 2007 DOES support drag and drop when VPC addons are installed and virtual box doesn’t.

    And networking has no problems either

    However i think you are using the final version of VPC 2007, I was talking about the version when vista was released(VPC 2007 beta). It was released because VPC 2004 did not support vista as a guest or host O/S. (this version was buggy with XP SP2 and didn’t install in some machines also had trouble with some processors), which was later improved with the final version.

    changes in that version was
    Support for hardware virtualization
    Support for Windows Vista as a host operating system
    Support for Windows Vista as a guest operating system
    Support for 64-bit host operating systems(with VM’s being 32-bit)
    Support for ISO images larger than 2GB

    but still I find VPC easier to work with :D

  7. blacknoise says:

    :arrow: about the error: Wizard can you please correct it

  8. Rosdi says:

    Thanks for doing this comparison, saves me a lot of trouble downloading and trying one by one. Now I am of to download VirtualBox!

  9. lorvince says:

    I’ve tried windows virtual pc and vmware and virtual box. vmware was sluggish and slow a little and didn’t like that feeling. Same with virtual pc but I kept virtual box because it’s fast and operates like as if you really installed on boot section of your laptop or pc. Thumbs up big time for virtual box.

  10. John says:

    Iv tried VPC2007 but found networking host vista and XP SP2 guest problematic. However Virtualbox does not pick up my XP machine and do the networking properly. I’m stuck!

  11. Wati says:

    Go virtualbox go.

  12. Meena Bassem says:

    well but microsoft virtual pc has better integration.that is why i liked it more than Virtualbox.
    Vmware has the best integration with hardware but much memory usage.
    so for me. Microsft Virtual PC is the best

  13. Joel says:

    @Meena Bassem: Well Microsoft Virtual PC is good but like mose MS apss its not that good in supporting other OS.

    Since Virtual box is Sun it does support other OS like Linux to the maximum.

  14. Meena Bassem says:

    there is only one thing that made me like Microsfot virtual pc more than Virtualbox.I can simply drag files from and into the Vm.
    i couldn’t do that in Virtualbox. that is all fro me.

  15. Arun says:

    I am not sure.. May be I have a bad setting .. I have 4 GB ram but Virtual PC has detected only 1.5 GB !!!! May be due to that the virtual PC was slower than VM ….

  16. Joel says:

    @Arun: No that is because Virtual PC only uses that amount you cant set the full amt of ram to the OS, otherwise how do you propose to use your OS.

  17. Leon says:

    Was the Drag and Drop Files aspect of VirtualBox really available? How it is done? Can u really do that from Host to Guest VM? thanks for the reply. :)

  18. Mađioničar says:

    VirtualBox is the best, tried it and recommend it to everyone. Great article !!!
    The best thing on virtualbox is excellent network support !