<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome 2.0 released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dotnetwizard.net/soft-apps/google-chrome-20-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dotnetwizard.net/soft-apps/google-chrome-20-released/</link>
	<description>:: Technology Simplified ::</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:43:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Underclass Hero</title>
		<link>http://dotnetwizard.net/soft-apps/google-chrome-20-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2713</link>
		<dc:creator>Underclass Hero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 03:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dotnetwizard.net/soft-apps/google-chrome-20-released/#comment-2713</guid>
		<description>Firefox is still the best browser. Chrome need developers for add-ons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox is still the best browser. Chrome need developers for add-ons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://dotnetwizard.net/soft-apps/google-chrome-20-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2712</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dotnetwizard.net/soft-apps/google-chrome-20-released/#comment-2712</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-4559&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Meena Bassem&lt;/a&gt;:

yeah, but the thing is, nothing has changed except for the version numbers, i see builds going up. but no RSS support and no built in support for plugins (or full support at least).

I still prefer FF 3.5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-4559" rel="nofollow">Meena Bassem</a>:</p>
<p>yeah, but the thing is, nothing has changed except for the version numbers, i see builds going up. but no RSS support and no built in support for plugins (or full support at least).</p>
<p>I still prefer FF 3.5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meena Bassem</title>
		<link>http://dotnetwizard.net/soft-apps/google-chrome-20-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2711</link>
		<dc:creator>Meena Bassem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dotnetwizard.net/soft-apps/google-chrome-20-released/#comment-2711</guid>
		<description>and....... i heard that chrome 3 was released but beta version
here it is
http://www.filehippo.com/download_google_chrome/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and&#8230;&#8230;. i heard that chrome 3 was released but beta version<br />
here it is<br />
<a href="http://www.filehippo.com/download_google_chrome/" rel="nofollow">http://www.filehippo.com/download_google_chrome/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meena Bassem</title>
		<link>http://dotnetwizard.net/soft-apps/google-chrome-20-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2710</link>
		<dc:creator>Meena Bassem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 01:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dotnetwizard.net/soft-apps/google-chrome-20-released/#comment-2710</guid>
		<description>Well.i got that version.but i don&#039;t really see any difference.
i hope that google company will keep on and continue developing.The most important missing part of it is the add ons.if they were added, it can beat firefox ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well.i got that version.but i don&#8217;t really see any difference.<br />
i hope that google company will keep on and continue developing.The most important missing part of it is the add ons.if they were added, it can beat firefox <img src='http://dotnetwizard.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blacknoise</title>
		<link>http://dotnetwizard.net/soft-apps/google-chrome-20-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2709</link>
		<dc:creator>blacknoise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 05:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dotnetwizard.net/soft-apps/google-chrome-20-released/#comment-2709</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-4421&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Eric&lt;/a&gt;:

its better. :D  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-4421" rel="nofollow">Eric</a>:</p>
<p>its better. <img src='http://dotnetwizard.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />   <img src='http://dotnetwizard.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://dotnetwizard.net/soft-apps/google-chrome-20-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2708</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 00:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dotnetwizard.net/soft-apps/google-chrome-20-released/#comment-2708</guid>
		<description>That looks great, and btw
Is 2.0.172.30, a better or worse version of Google Chrome, compared to this? (:

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That looks great, and btw<br />
Is 2.0.172.30, a better or worse version of Google Chrome, compared to this? (:</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  dotnetwizard.net/soft-apps/google-chrome-20-released/feed/ ) in 0.30198 seconds, on Sep 9th, 2010 at 12:03 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Sep 9th, 2010 at 1:03 pm UTC -->